MIT Mystery Hunt 2004: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
m (link, needs rewrite at some point)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


No team did this, so [[Setec Astronomy|Setec]] had to win the hard way.
No team did this, so [[Setec Astronomy|Setec]] had to win the hard way.

== Reviews and Write Ups ==
* emengee - [https://emengee.livejournal.com/36482.html Mystery Hunt]
* Eric Berlin - [https://web.archive.org/web/20040201033025/http://www.ericberlin.com:80/mt/archives/2004_01.html Random Observations From the Hunt]
* foggyb - [https://foggyb.livejournal.com/11213.html Getting Back on Track]
* Heaneyland! - [http://www.yarnivore.com/francis/archives/000179.html I went to the Mystery Hunt and it was fine]
* jadelennox - [https://jadelennox.dreamwidth.org/82458.html ramblings]
* noahspuzzlelj - [http://deadlymantis.blogspot.com/2004/01/i-spent-all-weekend-working-on-mit.html (no subject)]
* prog - [https://prog.livejournal.com/259966.html Longest birthday party ever.] - [https://prog.livejournal.com/260546.html (no subject)]
* tablesaw - [https://tablesaw.dreamwidth.org/187641.html Still Angry.]

Revision as of 18:22, 7 February 2023

Teams were given a plaster skull at the beginning of the hunt. Inside the skull was a map to the coin, and, at some point during the final runaround, teams needed to smash the skull to get through a wall, thus revealing the map. If any team had thought much about the plot points of the movie Time Bandits and decided to smash the skull earlier in the hunt, they would have been able to bypass the entire hunt and win.

No team did this, so Setec had to win the hard way.

Reviews and Write Ups