Wiki:Requests for comments: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
CoreyPlover (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
CoreyPlover (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Shortcut|Wiki:RFC}} |
{{Shortcut|Wiki:RFC}} |
||
< |
<onlyinclude>'''Requests for comments (RFC)''' are processes for gathering community input on an issue. Such issues may range from the top-level purpose of this wiki, right down to particular content to include in a particular article. |
||
They are intended as a means to gather viewpoints from a range of different editors and contributors, so everyone can have their opinions known.</ |
They are intended as a means to gather viewpoints from a range of different editors and contributors, so everyone can have their opinions known.</onlyinclude> |
||
The following is a directory listing of all Puzzle Wiki RFCs and their statuses, and is provided as a means to help users understand the reasons for past discussions, and to more easily contribute to currently open discussions: |
The following is a directory listing of all Puzzle Wiki RFCs and their statuses, and is provided as a means to help users understand the reasons for past discussions, and to more easily contribute to currently open discussions: |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
! Date created !! RFC Title !! Status |
! Date created !! RFC Title !! Status |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{sortkey|2022-03-15}}15-Mar-2022 || [[Wiki talk:Wiki#RFC |
| {{sortkey|2022-03-15}}15-Mar-2022 || [[Wiki talk:Wiki#RFC : Elements vs Solve Path vs Both|Elements vs Solve Path vs Both]] || '''Consensus''' to include puzzle elements in a suitable indicative ordering, and Solve Paths when useful and not redundant. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{sortkey|2022-03- |
| {{sortkey|2022-03-08}}8-Mar-2022 || [[Wiki talk:Wiki#RFC - The Scope of this Wiki|The Scope of this Wiki]] || '''Consensus''' in favour of including hunt and hunt puzzles only (with another RFC to determine inclusion of standalone puzzles) |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{sortkey|2022-02- |
| {{sortkey|2022-02-28}}28-Feb-2022 || [[Wiki talk:Style Guide#Request for Comment - Hunt Naming Conventions|Hunt Naming Conventions]] || '''Consensus''' in favour of using constructor titles |
||
|- |
|||
| {{sortkey|2022-02-28}}28-Feb-2022 || [[Talk:MIT Mystery Hunt#Request for Comment - MIT Mystery Hunt vs. Mystery Hunt vs. Other|MIT Mystery Hunt naming]] || '''Consensus''' in favour of "MIT Mystery Hunt" |
|||
|- |
|||
| {{sortkey|2022-02-25}}25-Feb-2022 || [[Wiki talk:Style Guide#Request for comment: Titling puzzle and round pages|Titling puzzle and round pages]] || '''Consensus''' in favour of using subpages |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
Latest revision as of 01:03, 28 March 2022
Requests for comments (RFC) are processes for gathering community input on an issue. Such issues may range from the top-level purpose of this wiki, right down to particular content to include in a particular article.
They are intended as a means to gather viewpoints from a range of different editors and contributors, so everyone can have their opinions known.
The following is a directory listing of all Puzzle Wiki RFCs and their statuses, and is provided as a means to help users understand the reasons for past discussions, and to more easily contribute to currently open discussions:
| Date created | RFC Title | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 15-Mar-2022 | Elements vs Solve Path vs Both | Consensus to include puzzle elements in a suitable indicative ordering, and Solve Paths when useful and not redundant. |
| 8-Mar-2022 | The Scope of this Wiki | Consensus in favour of including hunt and hunt puzzles only (with another RFC to determine inclusion of standalone puzzles) |
| 28-Feb-2022 | Hunt Naming Conventions | Consensus in favour of using constructor titles |
| 28-Feb-2022 | MIT Mystery Hunt naming | Consensus in favour of "MIT Mystery Hunt" |
| 25-Feb-2022 | Titling puzzle and round pages | Consensus in favour of using subpages |
