Wiki:Requests for comments: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
CoreyPlover (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
CoreyPlover (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
! Date created !! RFC Title !! Status |
! Date created !! RFC Title !! Status |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{sortkey|2022-03-15}} |
| {{sortkey|2022-03-15}}8-Mar-2022 || [[Wiki talk:Wiki#RFC - The Scope of this Wiki|The Scope of this Wiki]] || '''Consensus''' in favour of including hunt and hunt puzzles only (with another RFC to determine inclusion of standalone puzzles) |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{sortkey|2022-03-06}}6-Mar-2022 || [[Wiki talk:Style Guide#Request for Comment - Hunt Naming Conventions|Hunt Naming Conventions]] || '''Consensus''' in favour of using constructor titles |
| {{sortkey|2022-03-06}}6-Mar-2022 || [[Wiki talk:Style Guide#Request for Comment - Hunt Naming Conventions|Hunt Naming Conventions]] || '''Consensus''' in favour of using constructor titles |
||
Revision as of 15:31, 15 March 2022
Requests for comments (RFC) are processes for gathering community input on an issue. Such issues may range from the top-level purpose of this wiki, right down to particular content to include in a particular article.
They are intended as a means to gather viewpoints from a range of different editors and contributors, so everyone can have their opinions known.
The following is a directory listing of all Puzzle Wiki RFCs and their statuses, and is provided as a means to help users understand the reasons for past discussions, and to more easily contribute to currently open discussions:
| Date created | RFC Title | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 8-Mar-2022 | The Scope of this Wiki | Consensus in favour of including hunt and hunt puzzles only (with another RFC to determine inclusion of standalone puzzles) |
| 6-Mar-2022 | Hunt Naming Conventions | Consensus in favour of using constructor titles |
| 1-Mar-2022 | MIT Mystery Hunt naming | Consensus in favour of "MIT Mystery Hunt" |
| 25-Feb-2022 | Titling puzzle and round pages | Consensus in favour of using subpages |
