Wiki talk:Wiki: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Phenomist in topic RFC - The Scope of this Wiki
Content added Content deleted
CoreyPlover (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[User:Soni|Soni]] ([[User talk:Soni|talk]]) 03:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC) |
[[User:Soni|Soni]] ([[User talk:Soni|talk]]) 03:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
=== Option 1 : Hunt Puzzles and similar |
=== Option 1 : Hunt Puzzles and similar only === |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | This |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
=== Option |
=== Option 4 : Treasure Hunts and ARGs === |
||
| ⚫ | |||
=== Option 5 : Stand-alone puzzles === |
|||
'''Note''' - For simplicity, this option is not exclusive with Option 2B, 2C etc. |
|||
Hunt puzzles, plus other standalone puzzles of all types. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
'''Note''' - For simplicity, this option is not exclusive with Option 2A, 2C etc. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
=== Option 2C : Hunt Puzzles and Treasure Hunts and ARGs === |
|||
'''Note''' - For simplicity, this option is not exclusive with Option 2A, 2C etc. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
This is a puzzle wiki, we should generally add all types of puzzles. |
|||
=== Option 6 : All of the Above === |
|||
* '''Support, with caveats (and also deprioritize until later)''' I think ultimately, this is probably the option that creates the least questions of "what is a X puzzle?". But for that matter, I would say that the individual notability criteria for the different types of puzzles has a fairly wide range. For instance, we can catalog as many individual hunt puzzles as we can, but maybe for treasure hunts/rallyes/ARG's, it might make sense to only have pages for the top-level franchise, or second-level "hunt"-equivalent (i.e. not one page per clue). Escape rooms could be per company, I suppose, since we probably couldn't get much sourced material for each room. There are also other types of less-hunty puzzles (e.g. logic puzzles could be per genres, plus it could be integrated with "hunt puzzles that use a certain genre" elements. Puzzle games (most likely at a game-level page, not a page per level), mechanical puzzles, jigsaw puzzles, I guess should be evaluated on notability.)--[[User:Phenomist|phenomist]] ([[User talk:Phenomist|talk]]) 03:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC) |
* '''Support, with caveats (and also deprioritize until later)''' I think ultimately, this is probably the option that creates the least questions of "what is a X puzzle?". But for that matter, I would say that the individual notability criteria for the different types of puzzles has a fairly wide range. For instance, we can catalog as many individual hunt puzzles as we can, but maybe for treasure hunts/rallyes/ARG's, it might make sense to only have pages for the top-level franchise, or second-level "hunt"-equivalent (i.e. not one page per clue). Escape rooms could be per company, I suppose, since we probably couldn't get much sourced material for each room. There are also other types of less-hunty puzzles (e.g. logic puzzles could be per genres, plus it could be integrated with "hunt puzzles that use a certain genre" elements. Puzzle games (most likely at a game-level page, not a page per level), mechanical puzzles, jigsaw puzzles, I guess should be evaluated on notability.)--[[User:Phenomist|phenomist]] ([[User talk:Phenomist|talk]]) 03:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 03:48, 8 March 2022
RFC - The Scope of this Wiki
What is the scope of Puzzles Wiki?
Please express an opinion on these options below! A bolded Support, Oppose, or Neutral should be appended before writing further reasoning or discussion.
Do not use the "reply" button for initial comments; instead, edit this talk page like a normal page, add a new entry to the bulleted list by starting a line with *, then end your line with ~~~~ to sign your comment with your name and a timestamp.
Note that because of the scope of this question, Option 2 has been split for ease. So if you'd like to support Hunt puzzles + ARGs + Escape Rooms but not Rally-yes, just support 2A and 2C, but oppose 2B.
Soni (talk) 03:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Option 1 : Hunt Puzzles and similar only
This option limit our primary scope to Puzzle Hunts and Hunt puzzles. Some future delineation may be required to decide where exactly this line falls, but by and large, the primary scope of the wiki would be Hunt Puzzles.
Option 2 : Inclusion of Escape Rooms
Hunt puzzles, plus Escape Rooms and similar.
Option 3 : Inclusion of Rally-yes
Hunt puzzles, plus Rally-yes and similar.
Option 4 : Treasure Hunts and ARGs
Hunt puzzles, plus also Treasure Hunts, Alternate Reality Games, and similar.
Option 5 : Stand-alone puzzles
Hunt puzzles, plus other standalone puzzles of all types.
Option 6 : All of the Above
- Support, with caveats (and also deprioritize until later) I think ultimately, this is probably the option that creates the least questions of "what is a X puzzle?". But for that matter, I would say that the individual notability criteria for the different types of puzzles has a fairly wide range. For instance, we can catalog as many individual hunt puzzles as we can, but maybe for treasure hunts/rallyes/ARG's, it might make sense to only have pages for the top-level franchise, or second-level "hunt"-equivalent (i.e. not one page per clue). Escape rooms could be per company, I suppose, since we probably couldn't get much sourced material for each room. There are also other types of less-hunty puzzles (e.g. logic puzzles could be per genres, plus it could be integrated with "hunt puzzles that use a certain genre" elements. Puzzle games (most likely at a game-level page, not a page per level), mechanical puzzles, jigsaw puzzles, I guess should be evaluated on notability.)--phenomist (talk) 03:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
