Odd-One-Out

Odd-One-Out, also called Odd Man Out is a puzzle type and extraction method involving sets of things with a common property, and selecting the one item within that set that does not share that property.

Background[edit | edit source]

The odd-one-out problem is a common question featured in IQ tests, often found alongside analogy questions. Often, test-takers would be presented with a series of shapes or abstract images and asked to select the one option that doesn't share a particular characteristic with the other entries. Variations on this type of question included items presented in a sequence, wherein one member of the sequence does not properly continue it (which is commonly done with mathematical sequences), and words rather than shapes/numbers, where the goal is to either find an intended connection between all but one of the words or come up with some kind of connection that would exclude one of the entries (with the latter commonly being found on creativity tests).

A still from one of Sesame Street's 'One Of These Things' segments.

Another rather famous case of odd-one-out problems being used outside of puzzles is on the children's TV show Sesame Street. A common segment/song from the show is 'One Of These Things', which told viewers that 'One of these things is not like the other, one of these things just doesn't belong' and asked them to pick out one out of four things that either was not identical or did not fit with the category established by the others. Usually the difference was quite obvious, like a number '2' among three of the letter 'W', but sometimes it covered categories of items, like having a selection of vegetables and a single piece of meat. Either way, the purpose was to teach kids the concept of "differences", and the song accompanying the segments ingrained itself in many a child throughout its run. This segment first appeared in the first ever episode, and continued to be a regular occurrence at least until 2019. It also had a variation called "Three Of These Things" which asked the inverse question, attempting to teach the concept of "sameness".

Puzzle Application[edit | edit source]

As an entire puzzle[edit | edit source]

Odd-one-out puzzles can theoretically have anything as their subject. Most commonly, they're done with words, but they can also be reasonably done with numbers, music, images, or physical objects. It's also common to use non-words to represent particular words, such as in 2016's Road Trip puzzle (where car models had to be ID'd to get the words used in the comparison), but this method often results in extra constraints on possible words, leading to less interesting sets.

When it comes to the connections between the non-odd things, it can also vary quite a bit, but certain types tend to work better with particular subjects. When a puzzle uses only words as a subject, there is a lot fewer unique connections to work with. Often, writers will use anagrams, hidden themed substrings, and qualities of the words themselves rather than focusing on definitions. Conversely, if a puzzle uses non-words to represent word-based sets, definition-based sets are more common, along with other sets that would be immediately obvious if the words were given right away (like an identical substring). If the subject is some sort of media (book titles, music tracks, etc.), the connections can start to be more trivia-based, or otherwise make use of facts about the thing itself rather than creative interpretation.

Additionally, puzzles may take on the same pattern-based problems used in IQ tests, asking solvers to identify the "wrong" item in a sequence, sometimes adding the extra request of "correcting" the sequence by changing something about the odd-one-out.

As an extraction[edit | edit source]

Odd-one-out extractions are less common that full puzzles, primarily because they lack the pretense that makes the full puzzles work. A writer can't spring an odd-one-out final clue phrase, for example, and simply list off several things and expect a solver to guess one as the final answer. It can be done well, though, and that depends heavily on the type of puzzle it's being used as an extraction for. In particular, word-heavy puzzles with lots of individual words and phrases present are the best candidates for an odd-one-out extraction, since they have both the opportunity to tie it into a theme or clue it elsewhere, and have a lot of fodder to work with. On the flip side, puzzles that rely heavily on visual elements, logic puzzles, and puzzles with a lot going on already will struggle to make an odd-one-out extraction work, either due to a lack of precedent, a lack of material, or a lack of clarity.

Strategy[edit | edit source]

Identification[edit | edit source]

Identification of an odd-one-out problem, either as a puzzle or an extraction, is a task of easy-to-average difficulty. A puzzle consisting of a bunch of sets of 4-5 items/words/pieces of media will usually be (correctly) identified as an odd-one-out. This number range is the ideal range for these puzzles, as 3 usually gives too few options to make a meaningful connection between the non-odd items, and 6 or more either clutters the space or makes it harder to come up with both interesting and unique connections. However, some subject matter (especially those being used for the words they represent) will be so out-of-left-field that they could be overlooked as this puzzle type. As a rule, keep the 'Sets of 4 or 5' idea in your head, and if you encounter a bunch of them, consider that you might need to find an odd member.

Some odd-one-out puzzles can't be identified with this rule, because they ID their odd entries differently, such as being a break in a pattern (which may be much longer than 5 entries), or just as something erroneous in an image. To catch these cases, just be on the lookout for things that seem out of place, or otherwise make another "thing" in the puzzle not make sense.

Solving[edit | edit source]

The difficulty of solving an odd-one-out puzzle is mostly relative to the subject of the puzzle.

Physical objects have the potential to be very easy or very difficult to deal with, depending on whether solvers have access to the objects. If they do, there's a lot more that the writers can expect them to be able to determine about them (weight, density, size, etc.). Conversely, if they're only shown in picture format, solvers are limited to what they see and what they can look up about the items, which in turn limits how they can be compared.

Pieces of media tend to have a lot of information associated with them. Music has artists, albums, titles, and release dates. Books have authors, publishers, titles, and series, among other things. However, no matter how many streams of information a type of media has, they should all be available for collection, meaning there is a finite set of information solvers can know that the connection is found in. Additionally, connections in media-based subjects tend to not jump between info sources, so a connection is rarely made between, say, one song's title, another's artist, another's album, and another's composer.

With pure, word-based odd-one-out puzzles, there's a lot that can be made into a connection. Individual letters have qualities to note, including number of closed loops, symmetry, location on a keyboard, and ascenders/descender (in lowercase letters). Word-based connections can also use the words' definitions, hidden substrings within the words, or other puzzle-y transformations like beheading, anagrams, cryptograms, and Caesar shifts. As a whole, consider ways that words can be transformed similarly when faced with a word-based odd-one-out puzzle.

Notable Examples[edit | edit source]

Played Straight[edit | edit source]

  • Odd Man Out (MITMH 2005) (web) - A relatively straightforward word-based odd-one-out puzzle. Click to revealHas an additional layer where all of the odd-ones-out form five new sets where one of them is even odder-out.
  • Recover The Pokemon Core Memory (MITMH 2018) (web) - Five color-coded groups of words Click to revealthat belong to a particular set like 'zodiac signs' or 'animals', where one item is a fictional equivalent.

Notable Twists[edit | edit source]

  • Unprecedented Discovery (MITMH 2003) (web) - On top of each group of words having an odd-one out, each connection has to be identified since Click to revealthey all uniquely apply to one of the presidents of the United States, which is then used for ordering.
  • Fourth Place (Puzzled Pint Feb '16) (web) - An unsorted set of words/phrases that can be grouped into sets of four based on a particular connection. Click to revealThe twist is that each set of four can be further grouped into a set of 3 and an odd-one-out by an extra constraint on the connection (like CHINA, CHILE, COLOMBIA, and CAMBODIA being 'Countries starting with C', but CHILE being out of the 'Countries starting with C AND ending in A' group.
  • Worst Crossword Ever (Huntinality 2022) (web) - As a visual extraction method. Click to revealSince each set used in the puzzle creates a relevant image when highlighted, an odd-one-out can be selected based on words that break the coherency of the image.

See Also[edit | edit source]